Decolonizing Pedagogy: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge and Philippine Historical Narratives in Higher Education Curricula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.130Keywords:
Culturally Responsive Teaching, Curriculum Development, Decolonizing Pedagogy, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Philippine Higher EducationAbstract
This qualitative multi-site study examined how indigenous knowledge systems and Philippine historical narratives are integrated into higher education curricula across six institutions in Northern Luzon. Anchored in Decolonial Theory and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, the study explored faculty and student perceptions, current practices, and emerging strategies that align with decolonization goals. Findings revealed that while there is strong support for the inclusion of culturally rooted content, its integration remains inconsistent and often dependent on individual faculty initiatives. Participants identified key challenges such as lack of institutional frameworks, training, and authentic resources. Nevertheless, they proposed innovative pedagogical strategies, including community immersion, storytelling, interdisciplinary design, and co-creation with cultural elders, that foster inclusive, identity-affirming, and historically grounded education. The study concludes that decolonizing higher education requires a systemic reimagining of curriculum design, teaching practices, and epistemic authority, shifting from Eurocentric models to localized, culturally respectful frameworks.
References
[1] Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. UBC Press.
[2] Canlas, J. A., & Villanueva, T. P. (2024). Cultural interface in action: A case study of Philippine Indigenous education reform. IAFOR Journal of Education: Studies in Education, 12(3), 275–300.
[3] Cansino, J. A. S., Maulad, R. U., Magbata, S. M., Alvarez, D. J. E., Excija, Z. O., & Kuwih, J. A. (2022). Teachers’ experiences in the implementation of mother tongue-based multilingual education in Indigenous-learner-dominated schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 32(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2022/v32i230766
[4] Catama, B. V., Murillo, M. G. N., Marcos, P. V. G., Mesa, J. T., Navida, M. L. N., Delmar, Z. L. P., & Tabilin, K. C. (2024). Promoting heritage language: A phenomenological study on the approaches used by Cordilleran students. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31357/fhss/vjhss.v09i02.01
[5] Claudio, L. E. (2013). Postcolonial fissures and the contingent nation: An antinationalist critique of Philippine historiography. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 61(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/phs.2013.0000
[6] Colicol, F. L. (2024). Pragmatism as basis of the integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices in the Philippine K-12 Indigenous Peoples Education Program: Problematizing and ways forward. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(10), 1021–1033.
[7] Constantino, R. (2015). The miseducation of the Filipino (Reprint). Malaya Books.
[8] Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
[9] Harjatanaya, T. Y., Ferary, D., & Sarhindi, I. (2025). Education for sustainable development using participatory methodologies in Indonesian higher education: The case of Satya Terra Bhinneka University. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2024-0657
[10] Jamiran, M. N. S., Faiz, N. S. M., & Sari, N. M. (2024). Postcolonial critique and decolonisation process in education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 5(4), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.61186/johepal.5.4.96
[11] Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
[12] Lingam, G. I. (2022). Teaching and learning of Indigenous languages in the Pacific: Are we doing enough in teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2135487
[13] Pham, K. T., Ha, X. V., Tran, N. H., & Nguyen, Y. T. X. (2023). Curriculum reform in Vietnam: Primary teachers’ views, experiences, and challenges. Education 3–13, 51(3), 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2162829
[14] Pearnpitak, K., Akahat, N., & Moungon, P. (2024). Driving a three age learning curriculum from local wisdom under the “YANGKHINOK Model” in Thailand. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 24(3), 618–631. https://doi.org/10.69598/hasss.24.3.267777
[15] Rosnon, M. R., & Talib, M. A. (2019). Indigenous education rights: The Malaysian case. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(10), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i10/6470
[16] Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books.
[17] Sto. Domingo, M. R. (2015). Creating alternative community settings: The case of a community-based heritage project in the Philippines. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 1(2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1285/i24212113v1i2p61
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-06-16 (2)
- 2025-06-16 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kenedy G. Flores, MPA, LPT, CHRA, Aniza C. Gadaza, PhD, Don C. Galdonez, MAED-SST, Joemar N. Pihnuton, Ronnie B. Soriano, PhD, Alexander G. Killip Jr., PhD, LPT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.