The Roman Empire as a Foederatio: International Legal Aspects During the Dominate Era

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.2.512

Keywords:

jurisdictional stratigraphy, legal transfer, concept of imperial sovereignty, normative extrapolation, federative subsidiarity, foederatio

Abstract

The proposed study offers an in-depth analysis of the legal phenomenon of lex feuds, which operated as an integrative mechanism of jurisdictional stratification and identity construction within the Roman Empire under the Dominate. The research highlights the correlation between Roman ius publicum and the politico-legal architecture of Imperial Rome, which, despite its formal unitarity, displayed features of asymmetric federalism institutionalized through limited subsidiarity and jurisdictional layering. Central to the argument is that Rome’s international legal personality reflected its internal legal paradigms, embodied in its treaty-making capacity. The feuds functioned as a transitional legal tool between ius gentium and ius civile, enabling quasi-federative integration of barbarian tribes through modified patron–client relations (patronus–clientele). These agreements, while not conforming to classical norms of international law, became instruments of conditional homogenization, with the emperor acting as sacral-legal arbiter of legitimacy. The study employs systemic-analytical, historical-retrospective, hermeneutic, and comparative-legal methods, supplemented by axiological analysis and conceptual extrapolation. It demonstrates that the division regni did not fracture sovereignty but enhanced the administrative manageability of the Empire. Diplomatic agreements with external states further illustrate Rome’s differentiated patronage model, which informed later federative structures in medieval and modern Europe.

References

[1] Ammianus, M. (1974). Das römische Weltreich vor dem Untergang: Sämtliche erhaltene Bücher (O. Veh, Trans.; G. Wirth, Ed. & commentary). Artemis.

[2] Bayless, W. (1972). The political unity of the Roman Empire during the desintegration of the West, A.D. 395–457 (Doctoral dissertation). Brown University. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-4482

[3] Brandão, J. (2023). Confronting identities in the Roman Empire: Assumptions about the other in literary evidence. Bloomsbury Academic. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-4818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350354005

[4] Cameron, A. (1993). The later Roman Empire (AD 284–430). Harvard University Press. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-7828

[5] Canepa, M. (2020). The Iranian expanse: Transforming royal identity through architecture, landscape, and the built environment, 550 BCE–642 CE. University of California Press. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-5576

[6] Chaniotis, A. (2018). Age of conquests: The Greek world from Alexander to Hadrian. Harvard University Press. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-5338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674982406

[7] Congar, Y. (1954). Neuf cents ans après: Notes sur le “Schisme oriental”. Éditions de Chevetogne.

[8] Cook, J. (2000). The interpretation of the New Testament in Greco-Roman paganism. Mohr Siebeck. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-8727

[9] Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Kehoe, D. P. (2020). Roman law and economics: Institutions and organisations (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787204.001.0001

[10] Dignas, B., & Winter, E. (2007). Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity: Neighbours and rivals. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619182

[11] Drijvers, J. (2015). The divisio regni of 364: The end of unity? In East and West in the Roman Empire of the fourth century: An end to unity? (pp. 82–96). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291935_007

[12] Elton, H. (2018). The Roman Empire in Late Antiquity: A political and military history. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139030236

[13] Errington, M. (1996). Theodosius and the Goths. Chiron, 26, 1–28.

[14] Fernández, S. (2020). Who convened the First Council of Nicaea: Constantine or Ossius? The Journal of Theological Studies, 71(1), 196–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flaa036

[15] Friell, G. (1994). Theodosius (Roman Imperial Biographies). Routledge.

[16] Georgacas, D. (1947). The names of Constantinople. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 78, 347–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/283503

[17] Gibbon, E. (1932). The history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Christian Classics Ethereal Library.

[18] Grant, M. (1998). From Rome to Byzantium: The fifth century AD. Routledge.

[19] Harnack, A. (1961). History of dogma (Vol. 1). Dover Publications.

[20] Heather, P., & Rapley, J. (2023). Why empires fall: Rome, America, and the future of the West. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300275384

[21] Heather, P. (2017). The restoration of Rome: Barbarian popes and imperial pretenders. Oxford University Press.

[22] Homo, L. (1904). Essai sur le règne de l’empereur Aurélien (270–275). Ancienne Librairie Thorin et Fils.

[23] Hughes, I. (2013). Imperial brothers: Valentinian, Valens and the disaster at Adrianople. Pen & Sword.

[24] Ibbetson, D. (2015). Sources of law from the Republic to the Dominate. In D. Johnston (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Roman law (pp. 25–44). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139034401.005

[25] Labourt, J. (2020). Le christianisme dans l’Empire perse sous la dynastie Sassanide (224–632). Forgotten Books.

[26] Lookadoo, J. (2023). The Christology of Ignatius of Antioch. Cascade Books.

[27] Lozanova-Stantcheva, V. (2018). The inauguration of Constantinople: Inscenization of the past. Balkanistic Forum, 1, 315–324.

[28] Marcone, A. (2002). Pagano e cristiano: Vita e mito di Costantino. GLF editori Laterza.

[29] McQuade, E. C. (2024). From Republic to Empire: The Roman Empire explained: A journey through the most powerful civilisation in history. Independently published.

[30] Melnyk, V. (2024a). The creation of the Eastern and Western “parts” of the Roman Empire in 364 AD: Theoretical basis and consequences of Valentinian and Valens imperial diarchy. Juris Europensis Scientia, 1, 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/chern.v1.2024.1

[31] Melnyk, V. (2024b). The VI century Eastern Roman Empire: Steppe allies, Western Turks, and the Herat war. Amazonia Investiga, 13, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.8

[32] Melnyk, V. (2024c). The Roman Empire and the legal status of the Visigoths: The context of the lower Danube war of 365–369. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(1–2). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe015

[33] Odahl, C. (2012). Constantine and the Christian Empire. Taylor & Francis.

[34] Pohlsander, H. (2004). The emperor Constantine. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203622582

[35] Rees, R. (2004). Diocletian and the Tetrarchy. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474471909

[36] Skinner, A. (2013). The early development of the Senate of Constantinople. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 32, 128–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174962508X322641

[37] Smith, K. (2019). Constantine and the captive Christians of Persia: Martyrdom and religious identity in Late Antiquity. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520964204

[38] Stein, E. (1949). Histoire du Bas-Empire. Tome II: De la disparition de l’Empire d’occident à la mort de Justinien (476–565). Desclée De Brouwer.

[39] Stickler, T. (2007). The foederati. In The Blackwell companion to the Roman army (pp. 495–514). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996577.ch28

[40] Waldron, B. (2022). Dynastic politics in the age of Diocletian (AD 284–311). Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474498654.001.0001

[41] Yilmazata, M. (2018). Notes on the Res Gestae and historiographical views towards the Battle of Adrianople (378 A.D.). Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology, 5, 24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14795/j.v5i3.337

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22

How to Cite

Melnyk, V. (2025). The Roman Empire as a Foederatio: International Legal Aspects During the Dominate Era . International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI1.2), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.2.512

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.