Teaching Political Economy through OCOP Value Chains of Traditional Cultural Products: The Case of Ngoc Thom Conical Hats in Vietnam

Doi Van Tang; Do Thi Thanh Huong; Tran Trung Tinh; Nguyen Thi Hai Yen; Ngo Thi Thuy Duong; Tran Anh Tuan

doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.478

Authors

Doi Van Tang Ho Chi Minh National Academy of Politics, Hanoi city, Viet Nam
Do Thi Thanh Huong Faculty of Political Theory, Thuongmai University, Hanoi city, Viet Nam https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1708-1393
Tran Trung Tinh National Academy of Education Management, Hanoi city, Vietnam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-6692
Nguyen Thi Hai Yen National Academy of Education Management, Hanoi city, Vietnam
Ngo Thi Thuy Duong Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Hanoi city, Vietnam
Tran Anh Tuan Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Hanoi city, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI2.478

Keywords:

Ngoc Thom conical hats, OCOP program, value chains, traditional handicrafts, cultural economy, rural development, political economy.

Abstract

This study investigates the value chain of Ngoc Thom conical hats, a traditional handicraft from Tho Loc commune in Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam, officially recognized as a three star OCOP product in 2022. The research was conducted between January and June 2024 and involved 85 participants, including artisans, traders, and local officials. Data were collected through surveys, interviews, and field observations. The findings reveal that hat production provides 47.5 to 59.3 percent of household income, with average monthly outputs of 88.5 hats per household. Raw materials account for 41.6 percent of production costs, labor 28.9 percent, and miscellaneous expenses 29.5 percent. Sales increased after OCOP certification, but most products remain confined to local and provincial markets, with only 5.2 percent sold online. Interviews highlighted opportunities for branding but also revealed barriers to digital adoption and concerns over generational continuity. The study concludes that Ngoc Thom conical hats illustrate both the opportunities and constraints of integrating traditional crafts into modern value chains. They provide an instructive example for teaching political economy by demonstrating the interplay of culture, economy, and policy in rural development.

References

[1] Adama, H. E., & Okeke, C. D. (2024). Digital transformation as a catalyst for business model innovation: A critical review of impact and implementation strategies. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 256–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0066

[2] Bui, V. T. (2017). The role of families in the development of traditional handicraft villages in Quang Tri. Journal of Science and Technology Development, 20(X1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjssh.v1iX1.433

[3] Chan, Q. V., & Do, T. H. (2014). Vietnamese traditional crafts and their ancestors. Culture and Information Publishing House.

[4] Cunningham, S. D. (2002). From cultural to creative industries: Theory, industry, and policy implications. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy: Quarterly Journal of Media Research and Resources, 102, 54–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0210200107

[5] Duong, B. P. (2001). Preserving and developing villages in the process of industrialization. Social Science Publishing House.

[6] Eikhof, D., & Haunschild, A. (2007). For art’s sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28(5), 523–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.462

[7] Gadre, M., & Deoskar, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 – Digital transformation, challenges and benefits. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(2), 139–149.

[8] Giang, N. D. (2015). Tourism, traditional handicrafts, and community economic development: A value chain analysis of Phuoc Tich Heritage Village, Vietnam. Auckland University of Technology.

[9] Hartley, J. (2004). The ‘value chain of meaning’ and the new economy. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(1), 129–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877904040610

[10] Horng, S. C., Chang, A. H., & Chen, K. Y. (2015, October). The business model and value chain of cultural and creative industry. In Thriving in a New World Economy: Proceedings of the 2012 World Marketing Congress/Cultural Perspectives in Marketing Conference (pp. 198–203). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24148-7_63

[11] Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576

[12] Landry, C. (2000). The creative city. Earthscan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/NOE0415232418.ch17

[13] Ngoc, P. (2011). Vietnamese cultural identities. Literature Publishing House.

[14] Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, V. D. (2021). Digital transformation for handicraft products in Hanoi. Science Magazine, Hanoi Open University, 84(October).

[15] Nhung, N. L. H. (2020). The developing process of cultural tourism in Dong Ho Art School in Vietnam (Doctoral dissertation, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University).

[16] Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

[17] Potts, J., Cunningham, S., Hartley, J., & Ormerod, P. (2008). Social network markets: A new definition of the creative industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32(3), 166–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-008-9066-y

[18] Rashiya Bekmurzaeva, & Kovalev, G. S. (2023). Industry 4.0: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. SHS Web of Conferences, 172, 02011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317202011

[19] Ravasi, D., & Rindova, V. (2008). Symbolic value creation. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), Handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 270–284). Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200394.n49

[20] Rogerson, C. M. (2010). The enterprise of craft: Constraints and policy challenges in South Africa. Acta Academica, 42(3), 115–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v42i3.1259

[21] Shafi, M., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K., Ciliberto, C., Depczyński, R., & Ioppolo, G. (2022). Innovation in traditional handicraft companies towards sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(6), 1589–1621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17085

[22] Sirisuk, M. (2023). Thanh Ha Pottery at Hoi An, Vietnam: The social life of things and community of practice in the context of world cultural heritage city (Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University).

[23] Telagawathi, N. L. W. S., Suci, N. M., & Heryanda, K. K. (2022). Digital transformation strategy for handicraft SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Gianyar Regency, Bali. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 6(1), 47–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v6i1.36190

[24] Them, T. N. (2004). Discovering Vietnamese cultural identities. Ho Chi Minh City Publishing House.

[25] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2008). Creative economy report: The challenge of assessing the creative economy towards informed policymaking. United Nations Development Programme.

[26] Van hoa, P., Le Ngoc, Q. A., & Yovogan, M. (2025). Developing traditional handicraft products in Quang Binh Province, Vietnam, in the context of digital transformation. Annual of Sofia University, 24.

[27] Yang, Y., Shafi, M., Song, X., & Yang, R. (2018). Preservation of cultural heritage embodied in traditional crafts in developing countries: A case study of Pakistani handicraft industry. Sustainability, 10(5), 1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051336

[28] Zbuchea, A. (2022). Traditional crafts: A literature review focused on sustainable development. Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, 2(1), 10–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2022-0002