Semantic Shifts in the 21st Century: English, Polish, and Ukrainian Perspectives

Tetiana Nedashkivska; Svitlana Bernatska; Anna Pogorila; Lidiia Verbytska; Kateryna Diukar

doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.218

Authors

Tetiana Nedashkivska Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-8773
Svitlana Bernatska National Technical University of Ukraine "Ihor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3029-2396
Anna Pogorila Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-8942
Lidiia Verbytska Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-4553
Kateryna Diukar V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5364-1985

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.218

Keywords:

semantic changes, neologisms, English, Ukrainian, Polish, cultural factors, globalization

Abstract

The article is devoted to analyzing semantic changes in the languages of the twenty-first century on the material of English, Ukrainian and Polish, in particular their types, cultural causes and the impact of globalization processes. The study’s relevance is stipulated by the need to understand the mechanisms of language evolution in the modern world and their adaptation to new cultural and social challenges. Focusing on comparing English, Ukrainian and Polish allows us to identify common trends and unique features of semantic changes. The purpose of the article is to investigate the nature and causes of semantic changes in the languages of the twenty-first century, to systematize neologisms by semantic categories and to analyze cultural factors that influence the development of languages. The study used descriptive analysis, comparative and contrastive approaches, classification of neologisms, and cultural analysis. The study results show that semantic changes, such as expansion, narrowing and transfer of meaning, reflect modern socio-cultural processes. In English, technological metaphors dominate; in Ukrainian, terms are driven by socio-political realities; and in Polish, anglicisms are adapted to local norms. The analysis also shows the influence of media, social networks and information technology on the emergence of new meanings of words.

References

[1] Aitchison, J. (2001). Language change: Progress or decay? Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Language-Change-Cambridge-Approaches-Linguistics/dp/0521795354

[2] Akidah, M. A. (2013). Phonological and semantic change in language borrowing: The case of Arabic words borrowed into Kiswahili. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(4), 1–20. https://www.ijern.com/images/April-2013/42.pdf

[3] Algeo, J. (1991). Fifty years among the new words: A dictionary of neologisms, 1941–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[4] Anderson, S. (2014). Morphological change. In: C. Bowern & B. Evans (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. Routledge.

[5] Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: A review of concepts and evidence. In: K. Tore & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. (pp. 145–159). Novus Press.

[6] Asri, W., Rhamadanty, W., Burhamzah, M., & Alamsyah, A. (2024). Analysing semantic shifts in English and German by exploring historical influences and societal dynamics. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.37460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.37460

[7] Barnhart, D. K. (1985). Prizes and pitfalls of computerised searching for new words for dictionaries. Dictionaries, 7, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.1985.0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.1985.0030

[8] Brown, L. B. (2015). What's in a name? Examining the creation and use of sexual orientation and gender identity labels. Issues in Religion and Psychotherapy, 37(1), 23–32. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/irp/vol37/iss1/8

[9] Campbell, L. (2001). The history of linguistics. In: M. Aronoff & J. Ress-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics. (pp. 81–104). Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756409.ch4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756409.ch4

[10] Carlson, L., & van der Zee, E. (Eds.). (2004). Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorisation, and development. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264339.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264339.001.0001

[11] Chambers, W. W., & Wilkie, J. R. (2014). A short history of the German language (RLE linguistics E: Indo-European linguistics). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852386

[12] Chen, K. (2024). Analysis of semantic change from a lexical perspective. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(3), 342–344. https://doi.org/10.54097/myqkwn38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/myqkwn38

[13] Clayton, D. (2016). Attitudes to language change and variation. Knowing about language: Linguistics and the secondary language classroom. London and New York: Routledge.

[14] Cook, P. C. (2010). Exploiting linguistic knowledge to infer properties of neologisms. PhD dissertation. Canada: University of Toronto.

[15] Demyanchuk, Yu. I. (2024). War linguistics as a new lingosynergetic field: responding to the challenges of our times. Messenger of Kyiv National Linguistic University. Series Philology, 27(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2024.309607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2024.309607

[16] Fortson, B. W. (2003). An approach to semantic change. In: B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. (pp. 648–666). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch21

[17] Galang-Pereña, F. (2024). Language: The Soul of Culture and Heart of Identity. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 2(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v2i1.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v2i1.48

[18] Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436

[19] Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2016). Cultural Shift or Linguistic Drift? Comparing Two Computational Measures of Semantic Change. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. (pp. 2116–2121). Austin, Texas. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1229

[20] Hao, Y., & Chi, R. (2013). Analysis of English semantic change. Higher Education of Social Science, 5(2), 61–64. http://doi.org/10.3968/j.hess.1927024020130502.H534

[21] Kay, C., Horobin, S., & Smith, J. J. (Eds.). (2004). New perspectives on English historical linguistics, Volume I: Syntax and morphology. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.251

[22] Koch, P. (2016). Meaning change and semantic shifts. In: P. Juvonen & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Eds.), The lexical typology of semantic shifts. (pp. 21–66). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377675-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377675-002

[23] Lehmann, W. P. (2013). Historical linguistics: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416433

[24] Lehtinen, J. (2009). Language change as an evolutionary process. Master's thesis. University of Helsinki Open Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/19339

[25] Leonardo, Ch. (2022). How linguistic changes in English have affected the way people communicate digitally: modernism and postmodernism. UC Proceedings, 2, 131–140.

[26] Metcalf, A. (2004). Predicting new words: The secrets of their success. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[27] Milkowski, M. (2012). Język polski w erze cyfrowej. In: G. Rehm & H. Uszkoreit (Eds.), META-NET White Paper Series "Europe’s Languages in the Digital Age”. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London, Springer.

[28] Moreno, Á., Navarro, C., Tench, R., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Does social media usage matter? An analysis of online practices and digital media perceptions of communication practitioners in Europe. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.006

[29] Morrison, S. (2012). Lexical innovation in English at the end of the Middle Ages. In: Actes de colloque. (pp. 17–30). HAL Open Science. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00818338

[30] Perrone, V., Hengchen, S., Palma, M., Vatri, A., Smith, J. Q., & McGillivray, B. (2021). Lexical semantic change for Ancient Greek and Latin. In: N. Tahmasebi, L. Borin, A. Jatowt, Y. Xu, & S. Hengchen (Eds.), Computational approaches to semantic change (Vol. 6). Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.09069

[31] Stockinger, P. (2015). The semiotic turn in digital archives and libraries. Les Cahiers Du Numériqu, 11, 57–82. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-du-numerique-2015-1-page-57?lang=en&tab=illustrations DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/lcn.11.1.57-82

[32] Tahmasebi, N., Borin, L., Jatowt, A., Xu, Y., & Hengchen, S. (Eds.). (2021). Computational approaches to semantic change. Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5040241

[33] Traugott, E. C. (2006). Semantic change: Bleaching, strengthening, narrowing, extending. In: K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. 2nd ed. (pp. 124–131). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01105-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01105-6

[34] Winter, B., & Srinivasan, M. (2022). Why is semantic change asymmetric? the role of concreteness and word frequency and metaphor and metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1945419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1945419

[35] Zlatev, J. (2009). Levels of meaning, embodiment, and communication. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 16(3-4), 149–174. https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2337596