Extent of Utilization and Level of Competence in 21st-Century Instructional Pedagogies Amidst the Pandemic: A Cultural Lens on Higher Education Educators

Ana Liza Ordinario

doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI3.405

Authors

Ana Liza Ordinario Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6962-1681

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI3.405

Keywords:

instructional pedagogies, teacher competence, BLEPT, pandemic, higher education

Abstract

This study examined the extent of utilization and competence of higher education educators amidst the pandemic in a state university to address the low passing rate in the Board Licensure Examination for Professional Teachers (BLEPT) and improve overall teaching quality, recognizing that instructional effectiveness is vital for student achievement, especially in teacher education programs. Using a descriptive survey method, data were gathered from faculty respondents and analyzed through frequency counts, percentages, ranking, mean, and weighted mean. The findings revealed that teachers were highly utilizing and highly competent in applying various instructional pedagogies, demonstrating adaptability in shifting between traditional, interactive, and technology-driven approaches to meet diverse learning needs, while their high competence levels reflected mastery and confidence in employing these strategies, which are crucial for improving instructional delivery and student performance outcomes. To address identified gaps and constraints, a validated Enhancement Program was developed to strengthen teachers’ pedagogical skills and provide continuous professional development opportunities, underscoring the importance of sustained training and support mechanisms to ensure educators remain effective, innovative, and responsive to evolving educational demands.

References

[1] Albarico, A. (2014). A gateway to global competitiveness: Adequacy of instructional materials used by teachers teaching Technology and Livelihood Education.

[2] Albarico, M. (2014). Technology and Livelihood Education in the K to 12 curriculum. Cagayan State University Journal of Education, 5(2), 45–56.

[3] Ariaso, D. A., & Tancinco, N. P. (2016). The plight of Technology and Livelihood Education teachers in selected schools in the Municipality of Naval, Biliran, Philippines.

[4] Bidabadi, N. S., Isfahani, A. S., & Khalili, R. (2016). Effective teaching methods in higher education: Requirements and barriers.

[5] Bidabadi, N. S., Isfahani, A. N., Rouhollahi, A., & Khalili, R. (2016). Effective teaching methods in higher education: Requirements and barriers. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 4(4), 170–178. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079169/

[6] Bonney, E. A., Amoah, D. F., Micah, S. A., Ahiamenyo, C., & Lemaire, M. B. (2015). Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 139-150.

[7] Gardner, H. (2000). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (2nd ed.). Basic Books.

[8] Goodwin, B. (2019). Changing teaching practices for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Educational Research Service.

[9] Goodwin, J. (2019). Our creativity ambition for South Africa’s classrooms: How can we enhance creativity in education? The Lego Foundation. https://www.legofoundation.com/en/why-play/skills-for-holistic-development/creativity-matters/creativity-matters-report-series/creating-systems/

[10] Hettleman, K. R. (2007). Do not deny state’s kids a quality education. The Baltimore Sun. Maryland.

[11] Ignacio, A. E. (2021). Online classes and learning in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal on Integrated Education, 4(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v4i3.1301

[12] Isfahani, A. N., Bidabadi, N. S., & Rouhollahi, A. (2016). Teachers’ attitudes, emotions, and teaching competence in higher education. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 122–135.

[13] Lazarov, L. (2018a). Education in the 21st century—Pedagogical approaches in digital environment: “e-teacher” information system. Eastern Academic Journal, 2(2), 13-25.

[14] Lazarov, L. (2018b). Pedagogical transformations for 21st-century education: Addressing student engagement and performance. Journal of Modern Education Review, 8(5), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/05.08.2018/002

[15] Leary, M. R. (2010). Introduction to behavioral research methods. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09203.pdf

(Accessed August 5, 2013).

[16] Lesufi, P. (2017). Educating our children for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2016/17 VOTE 5: Education’s Annual Report Debate. Gauteng Legislature – November 30, 2017.

[17] Mohamed, R. (2014). Transforming pedagogy for the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 411–422.

[18] Nuqui, A. V., Cuenca, L. B., & Marcelo, C. R. (2015). Teachers’ use of multiple intelligences and learning styles in the classroom. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(9), 145–156.

[19] Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

[20] UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254

[21] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.