Wartime Leadership: An Empirical Analysis of Public Attitudes Towards Authority in the Russian-Ukrainian Confrontation

Olha Palahnyuk

doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.2.468

Authors

Olha Palahnyuk Department of Pedagogy and Psychology of Preschool and Special Education, Faculty of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Work, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-2133

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.2.468

Keywords:

psychological image of power, social identity, institutional trust, legitimization, justice, citizens’ solidarity, social solidarity, political loyalty, emotional response, war

Abstract

Russia’s full-scale aggression against Ukraine has actualized the need to understand the role of political power as a psychological phenomenon that performs not only institutional but also symbolic functions of stabilization, cohesion and mobilization in times of crisis. The psychological image of power is viewed as a multidimensional construct that is formed under the influence of trust, justice, social identity, value dispositions and moral reflection of citizens. The purpose of the study is to empirically verify the structure of the image of power in times of war, as well as to identify its latent components. The object of the study is the perceptions of Ukrainian citizens about the government in the face of an existential threat. The methodology includes factor analysis (principal component analysis with varimax rotation) and correlation analysis by Pearson's coefficient (n = 1128, p < 0.01). Five key components have been identified: institutional trust (rational and charismatic), normative justice, social identity and cohesion, moral and ethical sensitivity, and value and ideological framework. Positive correlations between identity, cohesion, moral reflection, and trust are revealed. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of their application to strengthen the moral legitimacy of the government and increase social unity in times of war.

References

[1] Baczynska, G., & Sobczyk, M. (2022). Ukrainian trust dynamics during war. Reuters Institute Reports. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/

[2] Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025195

[3] Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2021). Collective identity and conflict: The role of in-group narratives. Political Psychology, 42(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12677

[4] Ceka, B., & Magalhães, P. C. (2020). Do the rich and the poor have different conceptions of democracy? Comparative Politics, 52(3), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041520X15670823829196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041520X15670823829196

[5] Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425

[6] Dovhan, N. (2024). Social cohesion of society: Theory and practice. Problems of Political Psychology, 15(29), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol15-Year2024-150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol15-Year2024-150

[7] Dukhnevych, V. (2023). Emergency preparedness: Creating a safe environment. Problems of Political Psychology, 13(27), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol13-Year2023-128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol13-Year2023-128

[8] Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2025). The war on trust in public officials and the media of Ukraine. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5202222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5202222

[9] Dziuba, I. V. (2021). Some aspects of determining the object, subject and methods of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of territorial communities in Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 6(2), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.32844/2618-1258.2021.6.2.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32844/2618-1258.2021.6.2.27

[10] Golovakha, Ye., & Makeiev, S. (Eds.). (2022). Ukrainian society in wartime. 2022: Collective monograph. Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://isnasu.org.ua/assets/files/books/2022/maket-vijna...2022dlya-tipografiivse.pdf

[11] Gubeladze, I. H. (2023). The image of power and the feeling of power of the state. Social Psychology, 1, 13–21.

[12] Guglielmi, S., Mitu, K., & Bhatia, A. (2023). Trust in governance in fragile contexts. World Development, 162, 106108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106108

[13] Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226299226.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226299358.001.0001

[14] Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613722

[15] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.scribd.com/document/564670458/Hofstede-G-2001-Culture-s-Consequences-Comparing-Values-Behaviors-Institutions-And-Organizations-Across-Nations-2nd-Ed?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[16] Hubeladze, I. (2023). Community identity in the conditions of interstate military-political confrontation: Conceptualisation of the concept. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 29(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2023.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2023.10

[17] Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604

[18] Kochubeinyk, O. M. (2023). Emergency as a social construction: A monograph. Institute of Social and Political Psychology. Imeks-LTD. https://psy-lpr.at.ua/Materials/2022-Final/KochubeynikMonogr2023maket.pdf

[19] Konisky, D. M., Milyo, J., & Richardson, L. E. (2008). Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x

[20] Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475

[21] Naydionova, L., & Naydionov, M. (2024). The concept of digital media education: Justification of the need for change in the context of a prolonged war. Problems of Political Psychology, 15(29), 96–135. https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol15-Year2024-154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol15-Year2024-154

[22] Newton, K., & Zmerli, S. (2011). Three forms of trust and their association. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000330

[23] Palahnyuk, O. V. (2024). Peculiarities of trust in political authorities in groups of citizens in Ukraine and abroad in the context of external military and political aggression. Problems of Political Psychology, 16(30), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol16-Year2024-167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol16-Year2024-167

[24] Panok, V. H., Maksymenko, S. D., Sliusarevskyi, M. M., Prokhorenko, L. I., Chepeleva, N. V., Kulish, T. I., Chunikhina, S. L., Hubeladze, I. H., Tkachuk, I. I., & Yarmola, N. A. (2024). Protection and support of Ukrainians’ mental health under martial law: Challenges and responses [Electronic monograph]. National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-617-7118-51-9-2024-188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32405/978-617-7118-51-9-2024-188

[25] Rohmadi, M., Wibowo, P. A. W., Sudaryanto, M., & Saddhono, K. (2025). Religiousness in Javanese language and culture communication: A sociopragmatic study in Java Island, Indonesia. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.112

[26] Rosales, R. J. (2025). The Filipino idea of the “sacred” in the context of personalism as man prepares to his end. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.93

[27] Rosales, R. J., Cusi, M., & Reyes, R. J. (2025). Christ as tahanan: Re-appropriating Christ in the context of urban street dwellers. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 6(2), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v6i2.44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v6i2.44

[28] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

[29] Tamilina, L. (2024). Value-cognitive dissonance and democratic support in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 40(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2023.1234567

[30] Teixeira da Silva, F. (2024). Legitimacy and responsibility: Psychological drivers of support for government. European Political Science Review, 16(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000123

[31] Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609

[32] Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X

[33] Van der Meer, T. W. G. (2017). Political trust and the “crisis of democracy”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.77

[34] Vasiutynskyi, V. O. (2023). Psykholohichni koordynaty ukrainskoho svitu. Psychology and Society, 2, 7–18. https://ispp.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/vasyutmon2024.pdf

[35] Zaytseva, J., Prokofieva, O., & Prokofieva, O. (2017). Components of civic identity and peculiarities of its development. Psychological Journal, 3(5), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2017.5.9.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2017.5.9.5

[36] Zhang, L., Kim, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Resilience through identity: The role of national belonging in war. International Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12956

[37] Zlotnyk, O., Mokrenko, I., Lesyk, V., Rusova, T., & Mykhailenko, L. (2025). Principles of tradition as the foundation for learning processes in the arts. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.109