Basic Concepts of Russian and Kyrgyz Linguistic Culture

Upel Kadyrkulova; Meerim Kulchunova; Marina Belogortseva; Nelli Giliauzizova; Saule Zholovchiev

doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.336

Authors

Upel Kadyrkulova K. Tynystanov Issyk-Kul State University https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1962-0260
Meerim Kulchunova K. Tynystanov Issyk-Kul State University https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2735-5817
Marina Belogortseva K. Tynystanov Issyk-Kul State University https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0887-3744
Nelli Giliauzizova K. Tynystanov Issyk-Kul State University https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2681-9214
Saule Zholovchiev K. Tynystanov Issyk-Kul State University https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0329-6272

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.336

Keywords:

comparative analysis, language, lexical meaning, mentality, proverbs and sayings

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore key concepts represented in Russian and Kyrgyz linguacultural traditions. Through comparative analysis, the main similarities and differences in the Concepto spheres of Russian and Kyrgyz linguacultural were identified. The analysis of concepts in Russian and Kyrgyz linguacultural in this study was carried out in the context of such aspects as symbolism, cultural conditioning, expressive speech, dynamism, emotional intensity, and polysemy. Russian phraseology reflected Orthodox traditions, conveying moral lessons through metaphors. The Kyrgyz language placed emphasis on proverbs formed under nomadic living conditions, highlighting practical wisdom and spiritual values. In the Russian language, the concept of family was based on Orthodox principles of generational unity; in the Kyrgyz language, it was based on kinship ties, collectivism, and respect for elders, with a strong influence of traditions, customs, and, in the previous years, Islam. Russian culture was shaped under the influence of Orthodoxy, while Kyrgyz culture was formed under Islam and the traditions of nomadic life. Based on Russian proverbs and sayings, it could be concluded that nature served as a source of philosophical reflection, whereas in Kyrgyz culture, nature was closely linked to the perception of land as sacred. Hospitality in both cultures symbolized respect and high social significance. However, in Russian culture the emphasis was more on generosity and warmth of spirit, while in Kyrgyz culture it focused on sacred duty and tradition.

References

[1] Aftab, R., Mahmood, A., & Abdullah, M. (2022). Language and culture: A study in the sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(9), 5398–5412. https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/15366

[2] Al-Bader, Y. B., & Al-Qenaie, S. D. (2024). The semantic structure of Kuwaiti maritime proverbs: An analysis of natural semantic metalanguage. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2400796. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2400796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2400796

[3] Arora, A., Kaffee, L.-A., & Augenstein, I. (2023). Probing pre-trained language models for cross-cultural differences in values. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP (C3NLP) (pp. 114–130). Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.c3nlp-1.12

[4] Asfaw, D., & Bulbula, D. (2022). The relationship and role of culture and literature in the development of language. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, 6(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijss.v6i2.8640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/ijss.v6i2.8640

[5] Coschignano, S. (2022). Conceptual metaphors and framing in cognitive linguistics. Confinia Cephalalgica et Neurologica, 32(3), e2022028.

[6] D'Arcy, A., & Bender, E. M. (2023). Ethics in linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9, 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-015324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-015324

[7] Doszhan, R. (2023). Multi-vector cultural connection in the conditions of modern globalisation. Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review, 2(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.59214/2786-7110-2023-2-1-27-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59214/2786-7110-2023-2-1-27-32

[8] Efremov, A. (2025a). Psychiatry in the context of changing cultural norms: Mental disorders among migrants and refugees. Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 35(4), 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbct.2025.100544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbct.2025.100544

[9] Efremov, A. (2025b). The psychology of faith and religious identity: How theology shapes worldview and self-perception. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3020

[10] Gonçalves, J. C. (2024). What is (not) aesthetic education? Bakhtiniana, 19(2), e63561e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e63561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573p63561

[11] Hoff, S. L., & Barboza, G. (2025). Languages, language, and linguists: The study of the diversity of languages according to Saussure and Benveniste. Bakhtiniana, 20(1), e65692e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e65692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573p65692

[12] Horichko, Ya. (2025). Sacralisation of the female image during wartime in Ukraine and its reflection in graphic artworks. Art and Design, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2025.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30857/2617-0272.2025.1.2

[13] House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2022). Research report: Cross-cultural pragmatics. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 14(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0021

[14] Imai, M., Kanero, J., & Masuda, T. (2016). The relationship between language, culture, and thought. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.011

[15] Jiao, J. (2024). Theoretical and applied aspects of modern linguoculturology based on intercultural communication. Dragoman, 14(16), 171–193.

[16] Ju, F. (2024). Mapping the knowledge structure of image recognition in cultural heritage: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix. Journal of Imaging, 10(11), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10110272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10110272

[17] Karabekova, E., & Abdykadyrova, S. (2021). Translating methods of realities in English, Russian and Kyrgyz culture. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7(11), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/72/57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/72/57

[18] Khayatova, D. Z. (2022). Study of linguoculturology in linguistics. City of the Future, 30, 292–294.

[19] Kieliszek, Z. (2023). Interpretation of the fates and character of Antigone in Sophocles’ Theban Trilogy in the light of the Aristotelian theory of catharsis. Studia Warminskie, 60, 7–27. https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.8691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/sw.8691

[20] Kieliszek, Z. (2024). “Marriage” in the light of the thought of Immanuel Kant and John Paul II: Commercium sexuale or communio personarum. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.527

[21] Kim, J. (2022). A corpus-based analysis of conceptual metaphors with BITE and CHEW in English and Korean. Linguistic Research, 39(1), 55–93. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.39.1.202203.003

[22] Kira, I. A. (2022). The importance of clarifying the conceptual framework underlying cognitive optimization interventions: A comment on Moreau. American Psychologist, 77(8), 963–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001043

[23] Kongyratbay, T. A. (2021). Some problems of ethnic study of the heroic epic. Eposovedenie, 24(4), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.25587/e4294-4960-9721-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.25587/e4294-4960-9721-z

[24] Kongyratbay, T. A. (2023). The ethnic character of the Kazakh epic Koblandy Batyr. Eposovedenie, 2023(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2023.46.85.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2023.46.85.006

[25] Koshbakova, B. (2022). Sociocultural identity of the Kyrgyz in the context of globalization. Bulletin of the Jusup Balasagyn Kyrgyz National University, 14(1), 137–143.

[26] Kravets, L., & Semashko, T. (2024). Semantic innovations in contemporary media discourse. Dragoman, 14(16), 244–268.

[27] Kucera, D., & Mel, M. R. (2022). Beyond English: Considering language and culture in psychological text analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 819543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819543

[28] Li, J., & Ouyang, Z. (2022). The moral metaphor system: A conceptual metaphorical approach. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(6), 952–956. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23062.li DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23062.li

[29] Lievers, F. S., Bolognesi, M., & Winter, B. (2021). The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: Lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology. Cognitive Linguistics, 32(4), 641–670. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0007

[30] Löbner, S., Gamerschlag, T., Kalenscher, T., Schrenk, M., & Zeevat, H. (2021). Concepts, frames and cascades in semantics, cognition and ontology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50200-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50200-3

[31] Mambetakunov, E. (2022). The beauty of nature as a source of aesthetic education. Bulletin of the Jusup Balasagyn Kyrgyz National University, 14(3), 69–75.

[32] Mokoginta, K., & Arafah, B. (2022). Negotiation in Indonesian culture: A cultural linguistic analysis of Bahasa Indonesia textbooks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(4), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.09

[33] Nugraha, D. S. (2023). Examining the surprise in the proverbs in Indonesian and English: A comparative analysis using cognitive semantics. Global Journal of Arts Humanity and Social Sciences, 3(12), 1407–1421.

[34] Polzenhagen, F., Wolf, H.-G., Latić, D., & Peters, A. (2024). World Englishes and cultural linguistics: Theory and research. World Englishes, 43(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12655

[35] Ralyté, J., Chakravarthy, S., Mohania, M., Jeusfeld, M. A., & Karlapalem, K. (2022). Conceptual modeling. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2

[36] Rangriz, S., & Harati, M. (2017). The relationship between language and culture. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(6), 209–213.

[37] Rossiter, M. P., & Bale, R. (2023). Cultural and linguistic dimensions of feedback: A model of intercultural feedback literacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2175017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2175017

[38] Semashko, T. (2020). Ethnic stereotypes and their role in intercultural communication. International Journal of Philology, 24(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.03.004

[39] Shershova, T., & Chaika, V. (2024). Cultural memory and memory culture. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(1), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.188-195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog15(1).2024.188-195

[40] Shormakova, A., Ibraymova, L., Shormakova, A., Nurzhanova, B., & Daurenbekova, L. (2019). Nominations of the plant world lingo-cultural aspect. Opcion, 35(89), 607–623.

[41] Singh, J. K., & Jack, G. (2022). The role of language and culture in the academic adjustment and academic performance of international postgraduate students: Qualitative findings from Malaysia. Journal of International Students, 12(2), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12i2.2351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12i2.2351

[42] Storozhuk, S., & Kryvda, N. (2023). Collective trauma and group identity. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 11(1), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(1).2023.221-231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(1).2023.221-231

[43] Summerville, C. M., Chen, V. Z., Shoham, A., & Tarasa, V. (2024). Speaking of diversity: Can linguistic structural differences explain cultural values for justice, diversity, and inclusion around the world? Journal of World Business, 59(1), 101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2023.101501

[44] Tali, K. (2022). Contrastive analysis of English, Russian, and Hebrew color idioms. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 6(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i2.374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i2.374

[45] Tomašćíková, S. (2021). Intercultural communication, cultural code-switching, gender and food. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 3, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2021-3-122-130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2021-3-122-130

[46] Xiaoying, H., Baharom, S., & Sunjing, L. (2023). A systematic literature review on the relationship between cultural intelligence and academic adjustment of international students. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100622

[47] Zakirov, A., Turgunova, G. A., Ibraimova, G. O., & Shabdanaliev, N. A. (2021). Stratification of bilingualism in Kyrgyzstan in the context of leading languages. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(2), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1359

[48] Zavyalova, O., & Stakhevych, H. (2022). Female artist in European fine arts: Gender and professional status. Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review, 1(1), 20–29.

[49] Zhanybaeva, S. (2024). Dictionary of English Turkish Kyrgyz and Russian proverbs. Amazon.

[50] Zhukovska, V. (2020). Grammatical construction as the object of linguistic research. International Journal of Philology, 24(3), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.03.005